Demoracy and War Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Demoracy and War - Research Paper Example In that direction, as hypothesized by various thinkers, democracies may maximally avoid indulging in war with other fellow democratic countries. So, this paper focusing on the theoretical bases for the hypothesis regarding the absence of war between democratic states, will compare the theories behind this hypothesis, including how they are complementary as well as competitive. The theories and theoretical concepts put forward by various thinkers on the above mentioned hypothesis of democratic countries avoiding wars within themselves, are constituted under Democratic peace theory. Also, known as liberal democratic theory or simply called as "democratic peace", this theory is being analyzed by various study groups in both in the current political contexts as well as historical contexts. The theory and the related hypothesis had origins in the 18th century itself, through the works of Immanuel Kant, but came into more prominent circulation and were also scientifically evaluated after 1 960s only. Kant foreshadowed the basis of this theory in 1795 in his essay named, Perpetual Peace, in which he hypothesized that if the geographical territories or countries are constitutional republics, voted by common people, then there are good chances of actualizing perpetual peace. Immanuel Kant (1795) argued that â€Å"majority of the people would never vote to go to war unless it was in self defense; that if all nations were republics, it would end war, because there would be no aggressors.† (cited in Okoth, 2008). This hypothesis came into more prominence and research study in the second half of the 20th century, after the Second World War, as more democracies came into existence throughout the world. If viewed from another perspective, thinkers supporting the democracy peace theory state that due to the rise of many democracies only major wars or even Third World War has not taken place. As Barkawi and Laffey (1999) states â€Å"a defining feature of world politics in the late 20th century is the decline in the frequency of warfare between industrialized states†, with the existence of a ‘zone of peace’ between the democratic countries being attributed as the main reason. This hypothesis is further supported by a number of recent wars or conflicts, as it primarily took place between non-democratic countries or between one democratic country and a non-democratic country, but not between two democracies. For example, both the Wars in the Gulf involving Iraq in 1992 and 2003 were between an authoritarian regime and a coalition of democracies, and it is the same in the case of Afghanistan. Even the earlier wars in Korea and Vietnam involved communist regimes. However, when one views the perspective of thinkers having contrary opinions to this Democratic theory, there are exceptions to this hypothesis. For example, the Kargil War that took place between India and Pakistan in 1999 involved democracies, as well as the Israel-Egypt c onflict. Although there were exceptions, democracies avoid going to war with fellow democracies due to some valid reasons. Democracies are mainly viewed as the best outcome of wars and other independence or liberation or resistance struggles. That is, in the aftermath of major wars and struggles, country

A critical analysis of Ulrich's Model Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4000 words

A critical analysis of Ulrich's Model - Essay Example David Ulrich, the father of Ulrich model brought a new dimension to the practice of human resource management. He came up with a model or approach which re-defined the whole structure of functioning of human resource department. The aim of Ulrich was to bring about a change in the working process of the HR in order to make it more organized and structured. David Ulrich being a professor and an expert in human resource management gave rise to handful of principles and ideas for the upgrading of the HR working system. He is of the notion that the intangible elements of an organization play a very big role in the growth and value of a company. The model originated by Ulrich focused on allowing the human resource personnel to be more expanding and flourishing in the area of business. His ideas imparted more life to the human resource field that it became more valued and treasured. The current market utilizes his model in a very effective manner in order to change the overall face of thei r respective organization. Ulrich model enhanced the flexibility and workability of the business firms along with more growing opportunity to the staff and management. For the success of a given business, the approached defined by Ulrich has to be applied in a balanced way. Ulrich proves that employees in HR department can very well reach the status of an entrepreneur if works according to specific rules and design. Four Role Model by Ulrich The four role model of Ulrich throw light upon four main key elements: a) Strategic partner b) Change agent c) Employee champion d) Administrative expert. a)Strategic partner: It is all focused on the aligned working of the HR department by giving due consideration to international business standards, internal management system and business growth. Even though it looks conventional, it demands a lot of hard work and focusing from the HR staff. This role received more attention than other ones and were more applied by organization in their HR fun ctioning. It can be definitely argued that the line managers in the present organizations are playing the role of strategic partners. In the present organizational structure to contribute to the planning functions is very essential thing. Being a strategic partner allows the managers and heads of the HR field to contribute to business planning and strategy formulating. b) Change agent: By this aspect Ulrich mean that any organization should have the capacity to change and accept transition phase with ease. This is a very important area which needs to be concentrated by the organizations in order to expand and grow according to the changing global market trends and situation. This highlights exceptional capabilityof the HR professionals in being flexible so as to provide ideas to face changes occurring in the operational phase of the business firm.This aspect will allow the business leaders in overcoming problems raised due to change factor. The role of HR staff as a change agent is very valuable as it encourages and motivates the organization to take change as a challenge and bring positive outcome out of it. This also decreases chaos and disorganization among the employees and managerial heads. c) Employee champion: By this role the Ulrich means that the HR should be efficient in advocating the employees as and when needed and also should support and guide them when the company is undergoing change. This is very crucial role as it does not leave the employees ignored and rejected about the activities going on in the firm. The main focus of this role is to bring a right balance between the resources provided by the company and expectations of the employees. This brings about competency and efficiency among employees and also helps them in resolving their issue and problems faced in the organization on a routine basis. d) Administrative expert: According to this role, the HR staff performs the function of recruiting the employees or hiring them and handles the compensation issues, training